![]() ![]() ![]() Too much volume leads to testing fatigue for both students and teachers and can inadvertently cause the quality of the testing to suffer.Īs closely as possible, testing needs to reflect the objectives taught in a certain period of time. Summative assessments should be used only when absolutely necessary to determine the level of learning that has been achieved. Standardized tests are an example of assessment meant to be reliable in every setting.Įducators should avoid the urge to over-test. In other words, the reliability of an assessment implies that it consistently produces similar results when given under similar conditions. Tests given as summative assessments should hold up in another setting, or with another set of students. It’s one thing for students to memorize a fact or answer it’s another for them to comprehend the material in order for it to be helpful later in life. For example, a math test with equations alone is less effective than one with story problems or ways to associate the skill outside of the testing environment. Here’s how each fits into the summative assessment equation:Ī test should examine real-world applications. However, in order for a summative assessment to be most effective, five aspects must be in play: authenticity, reliability, volume, validity, and variety. Because of their broad scope but specific content focus, summative assessments can be a powerful tool to quantify student learning. Creating a classroom assessment that best quantifies your students’ learning can be tricky business. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |